The Gottman Ratio

The Gottman Ratio comes from decades of research at The Gottman Institute, a relationship research and training centre in Seattle founded by psychologists Dr John and Dr Julie Gottman. They found that relationships with staying power typically have a healthy balance of positive to negative interactions.

Specifically their research found that five positives to every one negative was the sweet spot, and in particular during conflict. If couples can maintain the 5:1 ratio, flooding the negatives with, for example, curiosity, humour, warmth, respect and interest, then uncomfortable discussions dont’ damage the relationship..

Although the original findings came from romantic partnerships, the principle applies just as well to friendships, families and professional relationships where trust and honest communication matter. (Which, let’s be honest, is most of them).

What it is and why it matters

The Gottman Ratio is a measure of the overall atmosphere of a relationship; about balance rather than rom com perfection.

Positive moments include even the tiny things like eye contact, in-jokes, a question asked with interest, or a thank you for something ordinary.

As well as the obvious arguing, shouting etc, negative moments might be irritation, criticism, defensiveness, passive aggression or simply disinterest.

When you positive moments outweigh the negative ones, the relationship tends to feel closer, nore connected and nicer to be in. Arguments are over more quickly, tensions easily dissipate, and little things don’t spiral into something more dramatic.

But negativity becomes the dominant tone of the relationship, then you’ve got problems. You start tiptoeing around subject. walking on eggshells and not saying important things because you know it won’t be received well. This chips away at the connection, an emotional distance starts to grow and the sense of goodwill towards the other drains away.

‘What did I even see in them?, What was I thinking?’.

The Gottmans also found something many couples recognise. One partner will sometimes say they had “no idea” their partner was considering ending the relationship, while the other can’t believe their partner managed to miss their clear messages of dissatisfaction for years.

The research suggests that this gap is often a sign of years of missed positive moments, unacknowledged bids for connection, and a climate that tipped towards the negative long before separation was ever mentioned.

How it plays out in different relationships

Romantic relationships

In strong couples, positive moments are sprinkled throughout the day. Humour, little kindnesses, stopping what they are doing to turn and fully listen to the other. These, the Gottmans found are the glue that holds partnerships together.

Long-term decline is rarely one big thing, but tends tends to come from repeated micro (or even macro)-neglect, overt/or direct ats of disrespect, rising tension and not enough positive interactions to counterbalance them.

Friendships

People stay close because they keep catching each other’s small cues – however often or rarely they see each other.
When a friendship loses its usual ease, it’s often because the positive moments have thinned out, or it’s become one sided. Without the positives, the dynamic becomes functional or even historical, rather than emotionally supportive.

Family

Warmth and acceptance plays a huge role here.
Parents who mix guidance with connection tend to create environments where children feel secure enough to cope with stress and express themselves.
An environment that’s not quite ‘I’d bury a body for you’, but messages of ‘I have absolutely got your back, even if i don’t 100% understand your choices’ – is what makes the trickier conversations possible.

Teams and leadership

I couldn’t find an official workplace ratio, but psychology research shows that teams with a higher proportion of positive interactions communicate better, innovate more, and feel safer speaking honestly. Leaders who encourage curiosity, fairness and celebrate each other create a safe environment, which is the foundation of all meaningful working relationships.

How awareness helps

This isn’t about keeping score or pretending everything is lovely. It is about noticing the tone you bring into your interactions. A few subtle changes make a surprising difference.

Look up a little more often.
Answer the small bids.
Repair sooner rather than later when something feels off.
Let your warmth be visible instead of implied.

These shifts turn daily interactions into connection rather than friction.

Try this today

Pick one relationship that matters to you.
Offer three small positives today.
A moment of interest.
A brief smile.
A thank you.
A question asked with genuine curiosity.

Notice how quickly the tone shifts between you.

Things to think about

Where are you generous with your positives, and where do they taper off
Which relationships have become more negative than you realised
How quickly do you repair tension
What atmosphere are you unintentionally creating
Which relationships already feel grounded and connected, and why

Optional challenge

Over the next few days, if a difficult moment happens, offer something positive within the next interaction. Not to balance the books, but to bring the tone back into a place where conversation feels possible rather than fraught.

A Buddh-ish take

Buddhist teachings often remind us that the quality of our attention shapes the quality of our relationships. Every interaction is a small vote for connection or distance. The Gottman Ratio is simply the psychological version of this idea.

As the Dhammapada puts it:
“Speak with kindness and your words will echo in the hearts of others.”

Connection grows in the small, consistent moments. A softened tone. A small pause to listen. A gesture that says, “I’m here.” These are the threads that hold relationships together over time.

Back to Mindset Mechanics <

Back to The Vault <

Ross spent much of his career at Stanford studying how we judge one another, and how often our assumptions say more about our own mindset than about anyone else’s behaviour.
He became one of the most influential voices in modern social psychology, particularly in the areas of conflict, negotiation, and how we interpret other people’s actions.

References

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10). Academic Press.

Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. (1991). The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. McGraw-Hill.

Dhammapada, Verse 129. (Traditional Buddhist text, attributed to the Buddha; various translations available.)